Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Arizona v. California 344 U.S. 919

← Cases

Arizona v. California

344 U.S. 919 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1953-01-19 Docket No. 10 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 919
No. 10,
Original.
Arizona v. California et al.
Fred O. Wilson, Attorney General of Arizona, Alexander B. Baker, Chief Assistant Attorney General, John H. Moeur, Burr Sutter and Perry M. Ling for complainant.
Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Arvin B. Shaw, Jr., Assistant Attorney

The motion for leave to file the complaint is granted and process is ordered to issue returnable within 60 days. The motion of the United States for leave to intervene is granted.

p. 920
General, Gilbert F. Nelson, Deputy Attorney General, Northcutt Ely, Harry W. Horton, Earl Redwine, James H. Howard, Charles C. Cooper, Jr., Donald M. Keith, Ray L. Chesebro and T. B. Cosgrove for defendants.

Attorney General McGranery and Solicitor General Cummings for the United States.