Hyperlawhypertext legal database Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp. 350 U.S. 1003

← Cases

Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp.

350 U.S. 1003 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1956-04-02 Docket No. 66 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 1003
April 2, 1956.
No. 66.
Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp.
Maurice Rosenfield argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Philip B. Kurland and Jack H. Oppenheim. David A. Fox argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Gerrit P. Groen and Roger Sherman Hoar.

Certiorari, 350 U. S. 817 , to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Argued January 16, 1956. Decided April 2, 1956.

The Court is of the opinion that the District Court correctly found there was proper service upon the defendant in this case. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to that Court for further proceedings.[1]

Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

* As amended by order entered April 9, 1956, post, p. 1012.

Cases cited