Hyperlawhypertext legal database Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad 350 U.S. 898

← Cases

Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

350 U.S. 898 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1955-11-21 Docket No. 436 English

Judges Mr. Justice Reed believes certiorari should have been denied and dissents from the judgment of reversal. Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that the petition for writ of certiorari should have been denied.

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 898
No. 436.
Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed.[1]

Mr. Justice Reed believes certiorari should have been denied and dissents from the judgment of reversal. Mr. Justice

* Amended May 14, 1956. 351 U. S. 183 .

p. 899
Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that the petition for writ of certiorari should have been denied.

Randolph J. Seifert and William A. Blank for petitioner. Robert M. Peet for respondent.