Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad 350 U.S. 926

← Cases

Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

350 U.S. 926 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1956-01-09 Docket No. 437 English

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 926
January 9, 1956.
No. 437.
Boston & Providence Railroad Corporation Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.
Armistead B. Rood, Joseph B. Hyman,

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

The motion of Boston & Providence Railroad Corporation Stockholders Committee for leave to intervene or, in the alternative, to file brief as amicus curiae is denied. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

p. 927
Cassius M. Clay and Sidney H. Willner for appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Robert W. Ginnane and Isaac K. Hay for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and William T. Griffin and Herbert Burstein for the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co., appellees.