← Cases

Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank

351 U.S. 916 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1956-04-30 Docket No. 731 English

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 916
No. 731.
Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco et al.
Charles K. Chapman for the Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Assn, et al., and F. Henry NeCasek for the Home Investment Co., appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.[[1] ]

* [As amended, post, p. 922.]

p. 917
General Burger, Samuel D. Slade and Donald B. Mac-Guineas for McAllister et al., and Sylvester Hoffmann for the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, appellees. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, filed a brief on behalf of the citizens of California, as amici curiae, in support of appellants.