The record in this case leaves us uncertain whether petitioner’s claim to the protection of the Due Process Clause .of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed upon by the Court of Appeals of Alabama. 38 Ala. App. 143 , 88 So. 2d 199 . Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the cause to that court in order that it may pass upon this claim. Minnesota v. National Tea Co., 309 U. S. 551 .
with whom The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Brennan concur,
dissenting.
Petitioner has made as strong a showing as possible that he signed the confession when he was insane. Throughout the whole proceeding he has claimed that the confession was involuntary. The judgment should therefore be reversed. See Chambers v. Florida, 309 U. S. 227 ; Leyra v. Denno, 347 U. S. 556 .
Cases cited
- Minnesota v. National Tea Co. 309 U. S. 551 p. 393
- Chambers v. Florida 309 U. S. 227 p. 393
- Leyra v. Denno 347 U. S. 556 p. 393