Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Morgan v. Ohio 354 U.S. 929

← Cases

Morgan v. Ohio

354 U.S. 929 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1957-06-24 Docket No. 206 English

Judges Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 929
No. 206,
Misc.
Morgan v. Ohio.
Ann Fagan Ginger and Thelma C. Furry for appellant.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234 , and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178 .

Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.

Cases cited