Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Wisconsin v. Illinois 355 U.S. 944

← Cases

Wisconsin v. Illinois

355 U.S. 944 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1958-03-03 Docket No. 2; No. 3; No. 4 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 944
March 3, 1958.
No. 2,
No. 3,
No. 4,
Original.
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al. ; Michigan v. Illinois et al.; and New York v. Illinois et al.
Stewart G. Honeck, Attorney General, and-Roy G. Tulane, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Wisconsin; Miles Lord, Attorney General, and Melvin J. Peterson, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of Minnesota; William Saxbe, Attorney General, and Robert E. Boyd, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Ohio ; Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General, and Lois G. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of Pennsylvania; Thomas M. Kavanagh, Attorney General, Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, and Nicholas V.

The application and motion herein are denied, with leave to renew the application and motion with allegations made more definite and certain as a basis for the relief sought.

p. 945
Olds, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Michigan; and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General, and John R. Davison, Solicitor General, for the State of New York, applicants-complainants. Latham, Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, Russell W. Root, Lawrence J. Fenlon, Joseph B. Fleming and Thomas M. Thomas for defendants. Frederick M. Rowe entered an appearance for the State of Illinois and the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago, defendants. Solicitor General Rankin, John F. Davis and David R. Warner filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae, at the invitation of the Court to express the views of the Government with respect to the application and motion. For previous order see 355 U. S. 909 .

Cases cited