Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255 v. Sax Enterprises, Inc. 358 U.S. 860

← Cases

Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255 v. Sax Enterprises, Inc.

358 U.S. 860 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1958-10-20 Docket No. 5; No. 6 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 860
October 20, 1958.
p. 861
No. 5.
No. 6.
Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255, et al. v. Sax Enterprises, Inc., et al.; and Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255, et al. v. Levy et al., doing business as Sherry Frontenac Hotel, et al.
Thomas H. Anderson and Thomas H. Bark-dull, Jr. were on the suggestion of omission for respondents. David E. Feller was on a response for petitioners.

Certiorari, 355 U. S. 902 , to the Supreme Court of Florida. Upon consideration of the suggestion of omission of parts of the record from the printed record, the Clerk is directed to print such parts as a supplemental record subject to further order of the Court as to the payment of costs incident thereto. The brief of the respondents is to be filed on or before November 1, and the cases are set for oral argument on November 10, next.

Reported below: 93 So. 2d 591 , 598.

Cases cited