Hyperlawhypertext legal database Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman 361 U.S. 805

← Cases

Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman

361 U.S. 805 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1959-10-12 Docket No. 34; No. 112; No. 139; No. 172 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 805
No. 34,
No. 112,
No. 139,
No. 172,
Misc.
Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; WORZ, Inc., v. Prettyman, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, et al.; Odum v. Illinois; and Foutty v. Marshall, Common Pleas Court Judge, Franklin County.
Gerard R. Moran and Edwin G. Martin for petitioner in No. 34, Mise. Eliot C. Lovett for petitioner in No. 112; Mise. Petitioners pro se in Nos. 139, Mise., and 172, Mise. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Alan S. Rosenthal and Seymour Farber for respondents in No. 34, Mise. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Ernest L. Folk III, John L. Fitzgerald and Max D. Paglin for respondents and' for the Federal Communications

Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.

p. 806
Commission in opposition in No. 112, Mise.

Reported below: No. 34, Mise., 105 U. S. App. D, C. 219 , 265 F. 2d 593 ; No. 112, Mise., 106 U. S. App. D. C. 14 , 268

Cases cited

  • 265 F. 2d 593 265 F. 2d 593 p. 806
  • 268 F. 2d 889 268 F. 2d 889 p. 806