Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Ray v. Ohio 364 U.S. 476

← Cases

Ray v. Ohio

364 U.S. 476 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1960-12-05 Docket No. 237 English

Judges Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 476
RAY v. OHIO.
No. 237,
Misc.
Decided December 5, 1960.
Ralph Atkinson for appellant.

The motion for leave to supplement the jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.