Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta California Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co. 365 U.S. 881

← Cases

California Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co.

365 U.S. 881 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1961-04-17 Docket No. 776 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 881
No. 776.
California Company v. United Gas Improvement Co. et al.
Justin R. Wolf, Charles A. Case, Jr., Melvin Richter and Woollen H. Walshe for petitioner.
J. David Mann, Jr., William W. Ross and John E. Holt-zinger, Jr. for United Gas Improvement Co., and Kent H. Brown for Public Service Commission of New York, respondents.
David Berger and Robert M. Beckman filed a brief for the City of Philadelphia, as amicus curiae, in opposition to the petition.

The motion to substitute California Oil Co. in the place of California Company as the party petitioner is granted. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.