Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau 369 U.S. 834

← Cases

Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau

369 U.S. 834 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1962-04-02 Docket No. 90; No. 91 English

Judges Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 834
No. 90.
No. 91.
Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau, Receiver; and Republic National Bank of Dallas v. Langdeau, Receiver.
Argued February 27-28, 1962.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Hubert D. Johnson and Neth L. Leachman argued the cause for appellants.
Marvin S. Sloman was with Mr. Johnson on the briefs for appellant in No. 90.
Mr. Leachman was on the briefs for appellant in No. 91.
Quentin Keith and W. E. Cureton argued the cause for appellee. With them on the briefs was Cecil C. Rotsch.

Appeals from the Supreme Court of Texas. (Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits, 368 U. S. 809 .)

These eases are restored to the calendar for reargument.

Reported below: 161 Tex. 349 , 341 S. W. 2d 161 .

Cases cited