Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily 369 U.S. 835

← Cases

Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily

369 U.S. 835 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1962-04-02 Docket No. 264 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 835
No. 264.
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily, Collector of Revenue of Louisiana.
Argued March 26-27, 1962.
Benjamin B. Taylor, Jr. argued the. cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Robert 0. Brown, Robert E. Rice, C. Vernon Porter, Laurance W. Brooks, Frank W. Middleton, Jr. and Tom F. Phillips.
Chapman L. Sanford argued the cause for appellee. With him on the briefs were John B. Smullin and Emmett E. Batson. Briefs of amici curiae, in support of appellant, were filed by Cicero C. Sessions for Sperry Rand Corp.; Forrest M. Darrough for Humble Oil & Refining Co.;

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Louisiana. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 368 U. S. 809 .)

This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.

p. 836
Charles D. Marshall for Thomas Jordan, Inc.; Albert L. Hopkins for Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.; Ben R. Miller for American Can Co.; and Robert E. Leake, Jr. for Ros-son-Richards Processing Co. et al.