Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Dugan v. Rank 369 U.S. 836

← Cases

Dugan v. Rank

369 U.S. 836 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1962-04-02 Docket No. 366; No. 606 English

Judges The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 836
No. 366.
No. 606.
Dugan et al. v. Rank et al.; and City of Fresno v. California et al.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Solicitor General Cox, J. William Doolittle, Roger P. Marquis and William H. Veeder for petitioners in No. 366.
John H. Lauten and Claude L. Rowe for petitioner in No. 606 and for respondents in No. 366.
Solicitor General Cox and Roger P. Marquis for the United

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.

p. 837
States et al., and Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, B. Abbott Goldberg, Denver C. Peckinpah, Adolph Moskowitz, James K. Abercrombie, Irl Davis Brett and J. 0. Reavis for the State of California et al., respondents in No. 606.

Reported below: 293 F. 2d 340 .

Cases cited

  • 293 F. 2d 340 293 F. 2d 340 p. 837