Arizona v. California — 370 U.S. 906

Majority

p. 906

No. 8,

Original.

Arizona v. California et al.

Argued January 8-11, 1962.

Mark Wilmer and Charles H. Reed argued the cause for the complainant. With them on the briefs were William R. Meagher, Burr Sutter, John E. Madden, Calvin H. Udall, John Geoffrey Will and Theodore Kiendl. Fred 0. Wilson and Martin J. Sonosky also were for the complainant. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Northcutt Ely, Special Assistant

This case is restored to the calendar for reargument and set for Monday, October 8, 1962. A total of six hours is allowed for the reargument.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

p. 907

Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of California et al., defendants. With them on the briefs were Charles E.. Corker and Gilbert F. Nelson, Assistant Attorneys General, Burton J. Gindler, John R. Alexander and Gerald Malkan, Deputy Attorneys General, Howard I. Friedman, C. Emerson Duncan II, Francis E. Jenney, Stanley C. Lagerlof, Harry W. Horton, R. L. Knox, Jr., Earl Redwine, James H. Howard, Charles C. Cooper, Jr., H. Kenneth Hutchinson, Frank P. Doherty, Roger Arne-bergh, Jean F. DuPaul and Henry A. Dietz. Solicitor General Cox argued the cause for the United States, inter-vener. With him on the briefs were John F. Davis, David R. Warner, Walter Kiechel, Jr. and Warren R. Wise. R. P. Parry argued the cause for the State of Nevada, intervener. With him on the briefs were Roger D. Foley, Attorney General, W. T. Mathews and Clifford E. Fix. Dennis McCarthy, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of Utah, defendant. With him on a statement on behalf of the State was Walter L. Budge, Attorney General. Earl E. Hartley, Attorney General of New Mexico, and Claude S. Mann, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of New Mexico, defendant. With them on the brief were Thomas 0. Olson, First Assistant Attorney General, and Dudley Cornell, Special Assistant Attorney General.

[For earlier orders herein, see 344 U. S. 806 , 919; 345 U. S. 914 , 968; 347 U. S. 985 , 986; 348 U. S. 947 ; 350 U. S. 114 , 812, 880, 955; 351 U. S. 977 ; 354 U. S. 918 ; 357 U. S. 902 ; 364 U. S. 940 ; 368 U. S. 893 , 917, 950.]

Cases cited

344 U. S. 806 344 U. S. 806 p. 907
Federal Trade Commission v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Co. 345 U. S. 914 SCOTUS 1953-03-09 p. 907
Arizona v. California 347 U. S. 985 SCOTUS 1954-06-01 p. 907
Arizona v. California 348 U. S. 947 SCOTUS 1955-02-28 p. 907
Arizona v. California 350 U. S. 114 SCOTUS 1955-12-12 at 880 p. 907
351 U. S. 977 351 U. S. 977 p. 907
354 U. S. 918 354 U. S. 918 p. 907
Arizona v. California 357 U. S. 902 SCOTUS 1958-06-09 p. 907
364 U. S. 940 364 U. S. 940 p. 907
368 U. S. 893 368 U. S. 893 at 950 p. 907