Hyperlawhypertext legal database Gray v. Sanders 370 U.S. 921

← Cases

Gray v. Sanders

370 U.S. 921 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1962-06-18 Docket No. 959 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan would note probable jurisdiction and deny the motion to advance, with leave to the appellants to apply to this Court for a stay of the injunction order of the District Court pending determination of this appeal.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 921
No. 959.
Gray, Chairman of the Georgia State Democratic Executive Committee, et al. v. Sanders.
Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, B. D. Murphy and E. Freeman Leverett, Deputy Assistant Attorneys General, and Lamar W. Sizemore for appellants. Herman Heyman, Morris B. Abram and Robert E. Hicks for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Probable jurisdiction noted. Motion to advance denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan would note probable jurisdiction and deny the motion to advance, with leave to the appellants to apply to this Court for a stay of the injunction order of the District Court pending determination of this appeal.