Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta New Jersey v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad 371 U.S. 885

← Cases

New Jersey v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad

371 U.S. 885 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1962-11-05 Docket No. 104 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 885
No. 104.
New Jersey et al. v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad Co.
Clarence M. Mulholland, Edward J. Hickey, Jr. and James L. Highsaw, Jr. on the motion.
Vincent P. Biunno for appellee, in opposition.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 370 U. S. 933 .) The motion of Railway Labor Executives’ Association for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.