Hyperlawhypertext legal database Holmes v. California 372 U.S. 710

← Cases

Holmes v. California

372 U.S. 710 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1963-04-15 Docket No. 70 English

Judges Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.; Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 710
HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA et al.
No. 70, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353 .

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360 .

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases cited