Hyperlawhypertext legal database Jones v. Healing 373 U.S. 758

← Cases

Jones v. Healing

373 U.S. 758 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1963-06-03 Docket No. 985 English

Judges Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and would decide the cases only after argument.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 758
JONES, CHAIRMAN OF NAVAJO TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NAVAJO INDIAN TRIBE, v. HEALING, CHAIRMAN OF HOPI COUNCIL OF HOPI INDIAN TRIBE, et al.
No. 985.
Decided June 3, 1963.[1]
Norman M. Littell and Frederick Bemays Wiener for appellant in No. 985 and for appellee Jones in No. 1050.
John 8. Boyden, Allen H. Tibbals and Bryant H. Croft for appellants in No. 1050 and for appellee Healing in No. 985. ■ ■

The motion to substitute Raymond Nakai in the place of Paul Jones as the party appellant in No. 985 and as a party appellee 'in No. 1050 is granted. The motion to substitute-Abbott Sekaquaptewa in the place of Dewey Healing as a party appellee in No. 985 and as a party appellant in No. 1050 is granted. The motion to affirm in No. 985 is granted and the judgment which is common to both cases is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and would decide the cases only after argument.