Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Harris v. California 374 U.S. 499

← Cases

Harris v. California

374 U.S. 499 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1963-06-17 Docket No. 135, Misc. English

Judges Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 499
HARRIS v. CALIFORNIA et al.
No. 135, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for' respondents.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353 .

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360 .

Cases cited