Hyperlawhypertext legal database Head v. California 374 U.S. 509

← Cases

Head v. California

374 U.S. 509 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1963-06-17 Docket No. 872, Misc. English

Judges Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 509
HEAD v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 872, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William, E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and A. Wallace Tashima, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis' is granted but. the motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353 .

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360 .

Cases cited