Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Butler v. Dunbar 375 U.S. 11

← Cases

Butler v. Dunbar

375 U.S. 11 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1963-10-14 Docket No. 244 English

Judges Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 11
BUTLER v. DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
No. 244.
Decided October 14, 1963.
J. Perry Langford for appellant.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Gordon Ringer, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.