Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Barnes v. North Carolina 375 U.S. 28

← Cases

Barnes v. North Carolina

375 U.S. 28 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1963-10-14 Docket No. 385 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, ante, p. 3, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 28
BARNES v. NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 385,
Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Samuel S. Mitchell for petitioner.
Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335 .

Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, ante, p. 3, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Cases cited