Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. 377 U.S. 903

← Cases

Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Co.

377 U.S. 903 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1964-04-20 Docket No. 846; No. 874 English

Judges Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 903
No. 846.
No. 874.
Textile Workers Union of America v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. et al.; and National Labor Relations Board v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. et al.
Patricia Eames for petitioner in No. 846.
Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Nancy M. Sherman for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent in No. 846 and petitioner in No. 874.
Thornton H. Brooks for Darlington Manufacturing Co., and Stuart N. Updike, John R. Schoemer, Jr., John Lord O’Brian and Hugh B. Cox for Deering Milli-ken, Inc., respondents in both cases.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of two hours is allotted for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 325 F. 2d 682 .

Cases cited

  • 325 F. 2d 682 325 F. 2d 682 p. 903