Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Ruark v. Colorado 378 U.S. 585

← Cases

Ruark v. Colorado

378 U.S. 585 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1964-06-22 Docket No. 1173, Misc. English

Decision Majority — Per Curiam. · Dissent — Harlan J.

Contents
p. 585
RUARK v. COLORADO.
No. 1173, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Petitioner pro se.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353 .

dissenting.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument.

Cases cited