Tancil v. Woolls

379 U.S. 19 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1964-10-26 Docket No. 386 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases.; Mr. Justice Brennan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Majority

p. 19

TANCIL et al. v. WOOLLS et al., JUDGES.

No. 386.

Decided October 26, 1964.^[1]

Allison W. Brown, Jr., for appellants in No. 386 and for appellees in No. 412.

Robert F. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, R. D. Mcllwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, William J. Hassan and Ralph G. Louk for appellants in No. 412.

. The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases.

Mr. Justice Brennan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.