← Cases

Harman v. Forssenius

379 U.S. 987 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1965-01-25 Docket No. 360 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 987
No. 360.
Harman et al. v. Forssenius et al.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Louis F. Claiborne, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for the United States, as amicus curiae, in opposition. Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, Richard N. Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Joseph C. Carter, Jr., and E. Milton Farley III for appellants on the motion.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. (Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 810.) The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in the oral argument, as amicus curiae, is granted and fiftéen minutes are-allotted for that purpose. Counsel for the appellants are allotted an additional fifteen minutes for oral argument. The motion of the appellants to strike the brief, as amicus curiae, of the Solicitor General is denied. Counsel for the appellants are allowed thirty days from the date of service to file a reply to the brief of the Solicitor General.