Hyperlawhypertext legal database Leh v. General Petroleum Corp. 380 U.S. 930

← Cases

Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.

380 U.S. 930 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1965-03-08 Docket No. 348 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 930
No. 348.
Leh et al. v. General Petroleum Corp. et al.
Maxwell Keith for petitioner Leh on the motion, Howard Painter, Francis R. Kirkham, William E. Muss-man, Thomas E. Haven, George W. Jansen, Jack E. Woods, Moses Lasky, Wayne H. Knight and Edmund D. Buckley for respondents.

C. A. 9th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 379 U. S. 877 .) Upon consideration of the motion of petitioner Leh for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis, it is ordered that the case be heard on the typewritten record.