Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Hainsworth v. Martin 382 U.S. 109

← Cases

Hainsworth v. Martin

382 U.S. 109 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1965-11-15 Docket No. 477 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question.; Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 109
HAINSWORTH v. MARTIN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS, et al.
No. 477.
Decided November 15, 1965.
Robert W. Hainsworth, appellant, pro se.
Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Hawthorne Phillips, Pat Bailey and Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

This cause having become moot in the light of the enactment of the Texas Apportionment Act of 1965, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas, is vacated, and the cause is remanded for such proceedings as by that court may be deemed appropriate.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.