Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta United States v. Maryland ex rel. Meyer 382 U.S. 158

← Cases

United States v. Maryland ex rel. Meyer

382 U.S. 158 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1965-11-22 Docket No. 543 English

Judges Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan, believing that a remand is legally unjustified, dissent from that part of the Court’s order.; Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 158
UNITED STATES v. MARYLAND FOR THE USE OF MEYER et al.
No. 543,
October Term, 1963.
Certiorari denied December 16, 1963. — Rehearing denied December 7, 1964.-
Rehearing and certiorari granted and case decided November 22, 1965.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose for the United States.
Louis G. Davidson, Richard W. Galiher, William E. Stewart, Jr., and Peter J. McBreen for respondents.

The motion for leave to file a conditional petition for rehearing is granted and the petition for rehearing is also granted. The order of December 16, 1963, 375 U. S. 954 , denying the petition for writ of certiorari is vacated, and the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed in conformity with our decision in Maryland for the use of Levin et al. v. United States, 381 U. S. 41 , and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for further proceedings with respect to the unresolved issues tendered in respondents’ bill of complaint.

R ü g0 ordere±

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan, believing that a remand is legally unjustified, dissent from that part of the Court’s order.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases cited