Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Zuckerman v. Greason 386 U.S. 15

← Cases

Zuckerman v. Greason

386 U.S. 15 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-02-13 Docket No. 71 English

Judges Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520.; Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 15
ZUCKERMAN et al. v. GREASON.
No. 71.
Decided February 13, 1967.
Leonard Feldman for petitioners.
Samuel Greason, respondent, pro se.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511 .

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520 .

Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530 .

Cases cited