Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Ass'n of the Bar

386 U.S. 17 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-02-13 Docket No. 300 English

Judges Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice Harlan in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U. S. 493, 500.

Decision Majority (1) — Per Curiam. · Dissent — White J.

p. 17

KAYE v. CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.

No. 300.

Decided February 13, 1967.

Morton Lif tin for petitioner.

Angelo T. Cometa for respondent.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511 .

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice Harlan in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520 , and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U. S. 493 , 500.

dissents for the. reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530 .

Cases cited

Spevack v. Klein 385 U. S. 511 SCOTUS 1967-01-16 p. 17
Garrity v. New Jersey 385 U. S. 493 SCOTUS 1967-01-16 at 520, at 530 p. 17