Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Daugherty v. California 386 U.S. 271

← Cases

Daugherty v. California

386 U.S. 271 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-03-13 Docket No. 19 English

Judges Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Delivered by Per Curiam. '

Contents

Majority

p. 271
DAUGHERTY v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 19,
Mise.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Pétitioner pro- se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and C. Anthony Collins, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

The motion for leave to proceed in Jorma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of. Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.