Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta McClellan v. California 386 U.S. 280

← Cases

McClellan v. California

386 U.S. 280 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-03-13 Docket No. 69 English

Judges Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 280
McCLELLAN v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 69,
Mise.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Petitioner pro se. ' "..
Thomas C. Lynch, -Attorney General of .California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The -judgment is vacated, and the case remanded for further 'consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.