Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Blankenship v. Holding 387 U.S. 95

← Cases

Blankenship v. Holding

387 U.S. 95 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-05-15 Docket No. 1089 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 95
BLANKENSHIP et al. v. HOLDING, dba GRAND NEWS.
No. 1089.
Decided May 15, 1967.
Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Jeff Hartmann, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.
Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan for appellee.

Probable jurisdiction noted. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it adjudged provisions of §§ 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be unconstitutional.