Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Ratner v. California 388 U.S. 442

← Cases

Ratner v. California

388 U.S. 442 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-06-12 Docket No. 10 English

Judges The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Clark, and Mr. Justice Brennan would affirm.; Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 442
RATNER et al. v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 10.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Richard A. Lavine for petitioners.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767 .

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Clark, and Mr. Justice Brennan would affirm.

Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476 , 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413 , 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Cases cited