← Cases

Sheperd v. New York

388 U.S. 444 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-06-12 Docket No. 26 English

Judges The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark would affirm. Mishkin v. New York, 383 U. S. 502.; Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 444
SHEPERD et al. v. NEW YORK.
No. 26.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Ira H. Holley and Eugene Gressman for petitioners.
Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is reversed. Red rup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767 .

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark would affirm. Mishkin v. New York, 383 U. S. 502 .

Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476 , 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413 , 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Cases cited