Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Schackman v. California 388 U.S. 454

← Cases

Schackman v. California

388 U.S. 454 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-06-12 Docket No. 995 English

Judges The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Clark, and Mr. Justice Brennan would affirm the judgments of the lower court. Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463.; Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 454
SCHACKMAN et al. v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 995.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Burton Marks for appellants.
Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.

The judgments of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, are reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767 .

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Clark, and Mr. Justice Brennan would affirm the judgments of the lower court. Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463 .

Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476 , 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413 , 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Cases cited