Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hadley v. Massachusetts 388 U.S. 464

← Cases

Hadley v. Massachusetts

388 U.S. 464 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-06-12 Docket No. 1179 English

Judges Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent and would affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Clark’s dissenting opinion in Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U. S., at 546.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 464
HADLEY v. MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 1179,
Misc.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Louis M. Nordlinger for appellant.
Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Willie J. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for further consideration in light of Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U. S. 523 .

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent and would affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Clark’s dissenting opinion in Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U. S., at 546 .

Cases cited