Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp. 389 U.S. 818

← Cases

Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

389 U.S. 818 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-10-09 Docket No. 335; No. 463 English

Judges Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 818
No. 335.
No. 463.
Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.; and United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Hanover Shoe, Inc.
James V. Hayes, Breck P. McAllister and Robert F. Morten for petitioner in No. 335 and respondent in No. 463.
Ralph M. Carson, Robert D. Salinger, Philip C. Potter, Jr., and Roland W. Donnem for respondent in No. 335 and petitioner in No. 463.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted. The cases are consolidated and two hours are allotted for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 377

Cases cited

  • 377 F. 2d 776 377 F. 2d 776 p. 818