Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Roberts v. Florida 389 U.S. 857

← Cases

Roberts v. Florida

389 U.S. 857 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1967-10-09 Docket No. 347; No. 371 English

Judges Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted in No. 347.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 857
No. 347.
No. 371.
Roberts v. Florida; and Nash v. Florida.
Stmley Jay Bartel for petitioner in No. 347.
Milton E. Grusmark for petitioner in No. 371.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James T. Carlisle, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in both cases.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied without prejudice to applications for writs of habeas corpus in the appropriate United States District Courts.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted in No. 347.

Reported below: No. 347, 188 So. 2d 392 ; No. 371, 188 So. 2d 391 .