Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Howard v. Ohio 391 U.S. 360

← Cases

Howard v. Ohio

391 U.S. 360 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1968-05-20 Docket No. 1217 English

Judges Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 360
HOWARD v. OHIO.
No. 1217,
Misc.
Decided May 20, 1968.
Neil K. Evans for appellant.
John T. Comgan for appellee.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.