Hyperlawhypertext legal database Branigin v. Duddleston 391 U.S. 364

← Cases

Branigin v. Duddleston

391 U.S. 364 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1968-05-20 Docket No. 1252 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U. S. 932, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court’s judgment, also acquiesces in the Court’s affirmance of that judgment.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 364
BRANIGIN et al. v. DUDDLESTON et al.
No. 1252.
Decided May 20, 1968[1]
John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Charles S. White for appellants in No. 1252. Marshall F. Kiser for appellant in No. 1263.
Leslie Duvall and William H. Sparrenberger for appel-lees in both cases.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 ( 390 U. S. 932 , sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court’s judgment, also acquiesces in the Court’s affirmance of that judgment.

Cases cited