Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Schneble v. Florida 392 U.S. 298

← Cases

Schneble v. Florida

392 U.S. 298 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1968-06-10 Docket No. 1070 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 298
SCHNEBLE et al. v. FLORIDA.
No. 1070,
Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 , 138 (1968).

Cases cited