Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Pickens v. Oliver 392 U.S. 300

← Cases

Pickens v. Oliver

392 U.S. 300 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1968-06-10 Docket No. 1076 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 300
PICKENS v. OLIVER, WARDEN.
No. 1076.
Decided June 10, 1968.
George T. Davis for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Deraid E. Granberg, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pau-peris and the petition for a writ of certiorari, are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 , 138 (1968).

Cases cited