Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Santoro v. United States 392 U.S. 301

← Cases

Santoro v. United States

392 U.S. 301 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1968-06-10 Docket No. 1219 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).; Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 301
SANTORO v. UNITED STATES.
No. 1219.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Robert S. Bailey for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 , 138 (1968).

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases cited