Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Hunt v. Connecticut 392 U.S. 304

← Cases

Hunt v. Connecticut

392 U.S. 304 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1968-06-10 Docket No. 117 English

Judges Mr. Justice Black dissents.; Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 304
HUNT v. CONNECTICUT.
No. 117,
Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.
James W. Marshall for petitioner.
David B. Salzman for respondent.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Connecticut is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Black dissents.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 , 138 (1968).

Cases cited