Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta McCarty v. Kansas 392 U.S. 308

← Cases

McCarty v. Kansas

392 U.S. 308 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1968-06-10 Docket No. 548 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 308
McCARTY et al. v. KANSAS.
No. 548,
Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and /. Richard Foth, Richard E. Oxandale, and Daniel D. Metz, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted with respect to petitioner Boyd. The judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293. The petition for a writ of certiorari with respect to petitioner McCarty is denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 , 138 (1968).

Cases cited