Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Holland v. Hogan 392 U.S. 654

← Cases

Holland v. Hogan

392 U.S. 654 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1968-06-17 Docket No. 653 English

Judges Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 654
HOLLAND et al. v. HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et al.
No. 653.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Robert Abelow, Marshall C. Berger, and Donald J. Williamson for appellants.
Frank S. Hogan, H. Richard Uviller, and Michael R. Stack, each pro se, and for Yasgur et al., J. Lee Rankin, Norman Redlich, and Stanley Buchsbaum for Adler, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for further consideration in light of Gardner v. Broderick, ante, p. 273, and George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Reid, ante, p. 286.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.